ARCHITECTURE OF TRANSIT PLACES

LEARNING FROM INFORMAL APPROPRIATIONS OF TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURES

Authors

  • Guilherme Lassance Doutor em Arquitetura, professor do Programa de Pós-graduação em Urbanismo (PROURB), Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (FAU-UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35572/arql.v3i12.6627

Keywords:

appropriation, informal, infrastructure, transportation

Abstract

This text addresses issues related to the sectoral and strictly utilitarian logic of transportation infrastructure projects, which are conceived to serve only the purpose and demand of traffic, resulting in low-quality spaces for the daily experience of most of the urban population. The research started from the hypothesis that, rather than being characterized as disorder, the informal appropriations of the existing infrastructures can serve as a lens for a programmatically expanded and more urbanistically integrated definition of those same infrastructures. To this end, the research was based on case studies conducted in the suburbs of Rio de Janeiro. The analyses of the observed situations revealed a series of spatial concepts that show high potential for innovation in the design and transformation of transit spaces into meaningful places within the city.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AUGÉ, M. Non-lieux: Introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité. Paris: Seuil, 1992.

CALTHORPE, P. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Architectural Press, 1993.

CARVALHO, S. A. de. Entre a ideia e o resultado: o papel do projeto no processo de urbanização de uma favela. Rio de Janeiro: Prourb/UFRJ, 2020.

CERVERO, R. The Transit Metropolis: A Global Inquiry. Washington D.C.: Island press, 1998.

COOK, P. Indeterminacy – Relaxed Scene. Archigram, n. 8, 1968.

EASTERLING, K. Extrastatecraft: The power of infrastructure space. Nova York: Verso, 2014

EWING, R., and BARTHOLOMEW, K.. Pedestrian- and Transit-Oriented Design. Washington, D.C.: Urban Land Institute and American Planning Association, 2013.

Fleury A. e Gomes, P. Public space and the metropolis: changing governance of public spaces around GPE stations, Urban Geography, n. 45:1, 2024, pp. 93–113.

GALARCE, F. E. e PATTENÁ, A. S. Arquitectura efímera e insurgencia urbana. Estrategias de apropiación del comercio ambulante en los espacios intersticiales del BRT TransOeste, Rio de Janeiro, Arquitecturas del Sur, v. 38, n. 57, 2020, pp. 108-127.

HABRAKEN, J. Supports: An Alternative to Mass Housing. Londres: Architectural Press, 1972.

KOOLHAAS, R. Delirous New York. A Retroactive Manifesto for Manhattan. Nova York: Monacelli Press, 1978.

MACIEL C. A. Arquitetura como infraestrutura. Belo Horizonte: Miguilim, 2019.

MONTEIRO, L.; PEREIRA, A.; CAPILLÉ, C. Tempo deslocado: uma leitura sobre a dinâmica dos movimentos pendulares metropolitanos no Rio de Janeiro. Natal. Anais do XVIII Enanpur, 2019.

PALMA, R. C. Por onde andam as pessoas na cidade feita para os carros? In Lassance G. et al., In-formal. Infraestrutura urbana revisitada. Rio de Janeiro: Rio Books, 2024, pp. 302-324.

ROUILLARD, D. e GUIHEUX, A. Project Hub: The Architecture of New Mobilities. Lausanne: Metis Presses, 2020.

UNGERS, O. M.; MÜHITHALER, E. (eds.). Grossformen im Wohnungsbau. Berlim: TU Berlim, 1966.

VAN ROOYEN, X. Megaform versus Open Structure or the Legacy of Megastructure. Histories of Post-war Architecture, v. 1, n. 3, 2018, pp. 30-49.

Published

2025-12-17

How to Cite

LASSANCE, Guilherme. ARCHITECTURE OF TRANSIT PLACES: LEARNING FROM INFORMAL APPROPRIATIONS OF TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURES. Architecture and Place Journal, Campina Grande, v. 3, n. 12, p. 61–72, 2025. DOI: 10.35572/arql.v3i12.6627. Disponível em: https://revistas.editora.ufcg.edu.br/index.php/arql/article/view/6627. Acesso em: 19 dec. 2025.

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.